Newt Gingrich Calls For Some Bold Conservatives

"This may be the most important CPAC since Ronald Reagan helped launch the annual gathering in 1975.

There are two big facts about the 2008 election.

FACT #1: Running as a bland, business-as-usual Republican will be a dead loser. In 2006, the American people repudiated the GOP, because the idea of Republicans' trying to manage the liberal welfare state they inherited from the Democrats was a dead loser. I am not sure many Republican consultants have come to understand this. Certainly the elite news media want Republicans to run as non-ideological "centrists" who will then have no persuasive appeal to the vast majority of Americans that elected Ronald Reagan in 1980 and '84 and the Contract with America House Republicans in 1994.

FACT #2: Focusing on an anti-Hillary campaign will also be a dead loser. The Clintons are the most determined and intense politicians of our lifetime. I just read Ambassador Bill Middendorf's A Glorious Disaster: Barry Goldwater's campaign and the Origins of the Conservative Movement (read my review here), and he reminded me of the ferocity of the 1964 Lyndon Johnson campaign. It reminded me of the Clinton campaign style.

If a campaign is going to degenerate into a mud slinging contest, the Clintons will always win because they are vastly more ready to jump into the pit. The recent attacks over David Geffen and Barack Obama are just a sample of how quickly and fiercely the Clintons will attack if the campaign is simply about who can "out negative" whom.

THE KEY to victory in 2008 is for conservatives to communicate three big messages:

1. America is faced with historic challenges that require historic responses. That is a much different style and approach than we get out of traditional politicians and their traditional consultants.
2. If we do the right things and implement the right changes, we can build a better, safer, freer and more prosperous America. We should have the nerve to go into every neighborhood and every community and explain why our better future will work. The liberal welfare state has failed, and its bureaucracies cannot be defended if we focus on the human costs of their failures. It is our challenge to focus on the big choices, the big truths and the big contrasts, not on the petty politics of personal viciousness that characterize so much of the current system.
3. This choice between a failed liberal, welfare-state future and an exciting, successful, conservative, opportunity- society future requires transformation at all levels of American elected office (511,000+ elected officials) and not merely the oval office."

See if YOU can find ONE genuine idea. I see an awful lot of political jargon and nothing concrete save for don't bash Hillary. I'm of the opinion that a savvy candidate should assemble all of the criticisms of RodHam as offered by her democrat challengers, making sure to refer to it as THEIR feelings. Then ask where THEY were wrong in such an assessment. Shrug a lot and say, "Hey, this is what her own party is saying about her..."

And remember. Blowjob Billy only won because of Ross Perot. Hillary getting 44% of the vote won't cut it unless...and this is a big unless...Rudi is diluted by a third party candidate.

Back to Newt: Come on, big guy. DETAILS.