But Don't Stop There...Please

"Please tell ten friends to tell ten today! The Breast Cancer site is having trouble getting enough people to click on their site daily to meet their quota of donating at least one free mammogram a day to an underprivileged woman. It takes less than a minute to go to their site and click on "donating a mammogram" for free (pink window in the middle).

This doesn't cost you a thing. Their corporate sponsors/advertisers use the number of daily visits to donate mammogram in exchange for advertising.

Here's the web site! Pass it along to people you know.

http://www.thebreastcancersite.com/

AGAIN, PLEASE TELL 10 FRIENDS TO TELL 10 TODAY

If this isn't a worthy enough cause, then there ain't one. Click. Then do it again.

In Memoriam: Clint Gertson

Many fine young men have given their lives in the fight against the moslem menace. I rarely single out an individual but a friend asked, and to learn more you can click on over to The Cook Shack.

Question For A Saturday Afternoon

When has the world NOT been riven by religious war? That'd be a toughie, because since the beginning of recorded history that's what all the talk has been about. The oldest stories, some of the them originating way before the advent of writing as a form of communication, are about three things.

1. Gods.

2. The antithesis of gods, aka devils or monsters.

3. Killing unbelievers.

Heroes arose to battle demons as well as the unfaithful. Gods and Demigods roamed the earth creating all sorts of havoc, and it predates copycat moslem and Christian faiths, because the Jews were compiling the precise percentage of spoils...camels, silks, virgins, etc, to placate their new boss of all bosses, the one God...and what a concept, way before islam came along to up the virgin ante or Christianity decided cannibalism would be cool to feature at Sunday services.

I've often asked when we'll be rid of the desire to wage war based upon the invisible beliefs of another, but most social scientists say probably never, and certainly not anytime soon. 90% of what children learn stays with them throughout their lives, be it heterosexuality or the worship of super beings, and when the formative years are chockerblock with deities the remainder of time spent on the green side of the grass is exhausted in the effort to get closer to the heavens.

The moslems, as moslems are apt to do, are at it again, and while I personally could care less what belief system causes an otherwise intelligent individual to dismiss reality in favor of fairy tale, the moslems are shoving it down our collective throats so every now and again I return to examine what started it all. We're all of us hotwired (okay, Paris Hilton and Teddy Kennedy notwithstanding) to find the answer, learn the truth, understand how things tick, and joining a heavenly choir is certainly easier than getting that doctorate in physics so most rely upon religion for their daily dose of problem solving. And just as there can be but one law(s) of gravity, there can be but one God. To suggest anything else is heresy. In the scientific community, heretics are laughed at then told to go Asia, or maybe even France, for funding. In the religious community, heresy remains punishable by death.

That sucks. I've always believed in the axiom stating that one is either part of the solution or part of the problem. And with the vast, overwhelming majority of us being part of the problem, I'm afraid the eggheads are correct. Going to hell in a handbasket, and we've greased our own skids.

We Get Letters

"Know anything about Delta force...?"

No. Hadn't even heard of it. What I do know is that one of the first things a newly elected President does is sign pardons for Delta Force members. Everything is filled in but the date. By law, they enjoy immunity from prosecution as long as a direct order was issued, ordering them to accomplish... whatever. For example, If the President asked Delta to shoot the Vice President in Macy's window, not only would they do so without blinking an eye, they could not be prosecuted. But...liberals and other weepy creatures are infamous for digging up loopholes or simply harassing patriotic Americans, so Presidential Pardons await such an event just in case. Of the 1000 Delta Force members, approximately 250 are wet-workers with the remaining number available for recon and logistics. Training is forever ongoing, as members die and retire, so new blood is always ready to step in.

Decisions...Decisions

I've never had any personal complaints with different sized/shaped handguns, and that's because in the service one shoots what one is given and does the best one can.

Basically, I never learned the fine art of whining. I of course have preferences, and were it merely for "feel", I'd carry and use the Glock 21 over the Glock 23 any day of the week.

But reality rearing it's ugly head has led me to believe that the ballistics obtainable from the 23 slightly surpasses the 21, so for CCW* I look to the 23 or 27, particularly during the hot Florida summers where smaller means better.

The Glock 21 rewards me with a tactile sensation that simply says, "hold me, shoot me." As if my hand were used as the template. Add that to the fact, not opinion, mind you, but fact, that aside from a specialized 1911, the G-21 is the world's best service/defense pistol in 45 caliber. There's a reason IPSC shooters favor 1911's and Glocks above all others, and Sevigny and Latham duels are legendary. Sevigny and his Glock's edge out Latham and his 1911's, but that is most probably due to the fact that Sevigny is slightly, ever so slightly, the better shooter.

Stock from the box PLUS a barrel and trigger upgrade means you've just bought a gun that for $750-$800 will kick as much competitive ass as your skill allows. But, will an $800 Glock beat a $3000 1911? No. Close, but no cigar. The add-ons for Glock just haven't arrived, but for 99.99% of the shooting public it is a meaningless comparison. You'd have to Ransom both guns to see the difference.

Ammunition improvements aside, I repeat the assertion that the G-23 is the best combat handgun for the money.

Fancy ass 1911's are what you show your friends. Dead-on reliable Glocks are what you show your enemies.

*In Florida, concealed means "carrying on or about a person in such a manner as to conceal the firearm from the ordinary sight of another person." Leave it to lawyers to insist that a word can define itself. What is has come to mean though, is fairly simple. If someone else cannot determine you are carrying a gun, the gun is concealed. Not so in pansy ass states such as Texas, where a bulge can send you to jail.

Women's Lib As Told By: Australian Islamic Honcho Boss Man, Sheikh Taj Din Al Hilaly

“If you get a kilo of meat, and you don’t put it in the fridge or in the pot or in the kitchen but you leave it on a plate in the backyard, and then you have a fight with the neighbour because his cats eat the meat, you’re crazy. Isn’t this true?”

“If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.”

“If the woman is in her boudoir, in her house and if she’s wearing the veil and if she shows modesty, disasters don’t happen.”

“Satan sees women as half his soldiers. You’re my messenger in necessity, Satan tells women you‘re my weapon to bring down any stubborn man. There are men that I fail with. But you’re the best of my weapons.”

“...The woman was behind Satan playing a role when she disobeyed God and went out all dolled up and unveiled and made of herself palatable food that rakes and perverts would race for. She was the reason behind this sin taking place.”

Does it NOT amaze you that neither Madonna, nor ANY of the harridans caterwauling their way through life, have denounced such teachings? This full-frontal-idiot condones rape and violence against women, something akin to say, Alabama of the early '50's, because after all, it's their own fault, and our liberals whistle their way past the graveyard.

She asked for it. She deserved it. Isn't the man's fault. Nancy? Hillary? Barbara? ANYBODY?

NYPD Cop Punches The Ticket Of Oxygen-Thief

"An off-duty NYPD sergeant trying to stop a cold-blooded execution on a Brooklyn street last night shot a 17-year-old gunman dead after the teen fired two slugs into him, police said.

Bleeding from the bullet wounds, Sgt. James Rector fired 11 rounds and mortally wounded Eric Hines as the teen was still trying to pull the trigger of his handgun, police and witnesses said.

Rector, a 34-year-old father of two, was taken to Bellevue Hospital, where he was in stable condition with bullet wounds in the left ankle and buttocks.

Mayor Bloomberg hailed Rector as a hero, saying, "Despite already being hit, he displayed incredible clarity of mind and coolness literally under fire that few of us could hope to muster."

The wild shootout occurred about 7:30 p.m. at the Walt Whitman Houses in Fort Greene, where Rector, a decorated 11-year veteran of the force, supervises a recruitment center.

Investigators said Rector had just finished his tour and was headed home when he heard shouting and gunfire coming from outside 14 Auburn Place.

"I saw people running, then I heard them yelling, 'They shooting! They shooting!' " said witness Charles Davis, 16.

Rector ran toward the violence and found an unidentified 26-year-old man on his knees begging for his life, police said. Hines was holding his .40-caliber gun at the man's head, apparently ready to fire, police said.

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said Rector identified himself as a cop and told Hines to freeze - only to have the teen wheel around, shoot and hit him twice.

The first bullet hit Rector's ankle and spun him around. The second hit him in the buttocks.

But Rector somehow steadied himself and nearly emptied his 9-mm. handgun, hitting Hines in the chest and leg.

Amid the chaos, a young boy grabbed Hines' gun and ran with it into 14 Auburn Place, police said.

When heavily armed cops entered the building, an ammo clip and packets of crack cocaine were tossed from a window, police said. Cops later led four men and a woman out of the building in handcuffs.

Investigators said they also found cocaine and marijuana in Hines' pockets.

The 26-year-old man who had been held at gunpoint by Hines was taken to Lutheran Medical Center, where he was in stable condition with a leg wound.

Detectives were questioning him and hunting for another unidentified man who ran to a car during the shootout and sped off. The car was found abandoned in Queens last night.

Hines' father, Eric Pitt, 38, a construction worker, said his son had just left his grandmother's apartment in the housing project "when some guys jumped out of a black car and started arguing with him. That's when the bullets started to fly."

"They killed my little man, my baby," Pitt said. "I don't even know who shot him. Nobody will tell me anything."

But a neighborhood resident said he believes the shooting was drug-related.

"One guy was from Walt Whitman, and the other was from the Ingersoll Houses" across the street, the resident said. "One carries a gun, the other carries a gun, both of them have a beef and this is what happens."

Where does one begin...

Getting shot in the ankle does not spin one around. Anyone who's been in a gunfight knows what really went down. The officer did not have a round in the chamber, realized this, turned for cover and/or concealment in order to jack one into the pipe, was hit in the ass then turned back and managed, somehow, to crank out 11 and hit the bad guy twice. A white officer shoots at a black man nearly a dozen times and the headline is quite different, by the way. You can look it up by googling Amado Dialo.

And please now; you expect me to believe that both the shooter and the man he was going to execute had guns? In NYC. Where it is against the law?

Baloney. The gun laws make that a virtual impossibility.

Friday Cartoon

Quick Shock II: And The Message Is Clear

Messenger Spotlight On Ohio

Another bastion of liberalism, where citizens recently snuck a concealed carry law past snoozing moonbats. Now, all of you liberals bear with me because I'm going to feature something called STATISTICS.

The Justice Department tells us, that on average close to 200,000 battered women successfully use guns to protect themselves each year.

Battered women move around a lot, but more times than not they remain in the same state. Family, and all that. To liberals, family is another incomprehensible word, but trust me on this one, lots of folks think it is important.

So these unfortunate girls and women of Ohio, thousands of them, remain in Ohio after escaping a violent husband, and in order to protect themselves, obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon. The violent husband searches high and low but to no avail. He cannot locate and teach the bitch a new lesson she'll never forget.

Enter the liberal media. You know, the one forever telling us that it is on the side of women. And children. Let's not forget the children, because oft times they suffer more than being made to bear witness, and are battered and killed as well.

BUT...the gals went and done a bad, bad, thing. They got a gun. Legally, no less. In Ohio, this means a license and a license means you are required to list your current address. So to punish them for transgressions against the liberal agenda, the Ohio media publishes the names and addresses of ALL concealed weapon licensees.

Having a hard time finding the bitch? Check with the media. Chances are, her or someone sharing her maiden name has obtained a concealed carry permit.

Other states allowed the media access to these addresses as well, but soon learned the terrible lesson and began shielding law abiding citizens from the ravages of the press. The same press that pushes the "Privacy Clause" of the Constitution down our throats but gleefully points an enraged spouse or boyfriend to the new home of a woman trying to forever escape his wrath.

Ohio liberals are really, really pissed about this concealed weapons deal. Get one, and they'll tell him where you live.

Quick Shock: The Medium Is The Message

"Our prisons are overflowing with gang members, gangsta rappers are daily being shot dead in the streets, the media continues to mindlessly pander to a hateful, violent and criminal gang culture that lays us all low . . .

. . . and on a Sunday night Fox opens Game 2 of the World Series with a partial number by Eminem and 50 Cent, a number that in full includes unprintable vulgarities, glorified references to weapons and shootouts, the word "nigga" and the requisite designation of women as "bitches."

Two weeks earlier, Fox fired Steve Lyons for a perceived ethnic crack."

The media panders because the panderees vote the Democratic ticket. Brothers to the cause.

Sassy Smiths That Dirty Harry Would Approve

When Hollyweird Accidentally Finds Someone Who Can Use A Gun...

To save yourself the hassle of watching too much from a really bad old TV show, let the video load then move to about 3/4's of the way into it, then click PLAY.

The guy was good. Real good.

We Get Letters

"Is this true...found it at Buffaloe Bore web sight?"

"Glock happens to chamber their 40 S&W pistols without a fully supported chamber and both of those above safety notices are likely aimed at Glock. I know of no other 40 S&W handguns being sold in the US that don’t have fully supported chambers. If you really want to shoot our 40S&W ammo in your Glock, have an after market barrel that uses a supported chamber, dropped into it."

No. It is not true. In any way, shape, or form. There is not a fully supported chamber in existance with regards to off-the-shelf handguns. Specialty race-guns sometimes have them because feeding is not a problem for the bullet the gun likes the best is the one always used, as well as the simple fact that such weapons are used for games and not life and death situations.

It is true that years ago Glock barrels featured LESS chamber support. This was to assure the feed of pretty much any type cartridge in existance. Then hand-loaders started cranking up their rounds, and even law enforcement got its hands on ammunition that was unsuitable for ANY gun, so Glock redesigned the barrels. Not that there was anything truly wrong with the older .40 cals, but enough was enough. Too many chairborne commando's spreading lies and innuendo.

The 22's, 23's, and 27's manufactured after 1999 or thereabouts, are as supported as any combat/defense gun on the market today. The downside to this is that they will not feed, fire, and fling with the same aplomb as the older barrels, but any modern factory ammuntion should work just fine.

As is the case with any recommendation regarding firearms, test, test, then test. One should shoot 100 rounds or so of the same bullet from the same magazines in the same gun that is to be used for self defense. The ones that work without a hitch and/or make the more accurate, dastardly holes in innocent paper are the ones to use for shit-hit-the-fan time.

Buffalo Bore is run by folks who do not like Glocks. There is simply no other way to explain such absolute bullshit, for ammunition "experts" simply cannot be that dumb.

Now drop and give me 20 for your atrocious spelling.

Just For Kicks...And Since Halloween Is Right Around The Corner...

	Your Personal Day of Death is... March 25, 2039
	Friday, March 25, 2039 Seconds left to live...1,022,636,535 1,022,636,569

The Death Clock. Click For Yours.

Feisty Gal Brains Robber Who Then Steals Policeman's Cell Phone...

Woman Wallops Intruder With Cooking Pot

MUNCIE, Ind. (AP) - "A woman watching television in her nightgown raced from her bedroom and attacked a man with a cooking pot after he stole golf clubs from her porch, police said. Sabrena Davis said she first grabbed a knife after a neighbor yelled to tell her that a man had taken the clubs, but

then decided to instead attack him with a 10-inch cooking pot.

"I started beating him with it. He asked for it," she said.

Davis' attack slowed Timothy A. Simison, 27, until police arrested him outside her home Tuesday morning shortly after she had whacked him in the head and shoulders with the pot.

The Hartford City man, who was being held without bond Wednesday at the Delaware County Jail, faces preliminary charges of attempted burglary and theft.

Police said Simison was on a crack cocaine binge when he tried burglarizing the two-story house where Davis, 36, lives with her brother, Maurice Garrett.

A neighbor who noticed Simison on the enclosed front porch where Garrett keeps tool boxes, tackle boxes and golf clubs cornered Simison on the porch and yelled to Davis, who ran downstairs and attacked with the pot.

Simison tried to escape custody several times, including working his handcuffed hands from behind his back to his front by passing them under his feet, said Muncie police Lt. Al Williams.

When police searched Simison before placing him in a holding cell at city hall, they found a cell phone in one of his socks belonging to one of the officers who had transported him.

"Talk about a klepto. If you sit back and look at this, it's almost comical," Williams said."

Yes. Your police department is comical, Lieutenant. Thank heavens for citizens defending themselves, or your collection of Barney Fife wannabees would be forced to protect and defend. All by their lonesome. Scary.

Stop The ACLU Blogburst Thursday

Jay over at STOP adds his 2 cents to the New Jersey gay marriage nonsense:

"Yesterday I reported on the judicial activism of the New Jersey Court in mandating gay marriage in all but name. I stated that the decision was a mixed bag but it opened many doors we should be aware of. I also stated that while the ACLU were involved in the lawsuit I wasn’t sure exactly what their reaction would be. I am wondering no more. The ACLU are cheering!

The American Civil Liberties Union today cheered a unanimous decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court holding that it is unconstitutional for the state to bar same-sex couples from the hundreds of family protections the state provides through marriage. The court referred the matter to the state legislature, which has 180 days to either amend existing marriage laws or create some other system to give same-sex couples the same marriage protections under the law.

“Today’s court decision is a giant step toward ending the unfairness that same-sex couples face in marriage,” said Matt Coles, Director of the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Project. “Same-sex couples fall in love, make commitments and build families just like opposite-sex couples. And as the court ruled today, same-sex couples shouldn’t be denied the important family protections that come with marriage. We now call on the New Jersey legislature to make sure that same-sex couples are not denied the dignity that comes only through marriage.”

Public support for marriage for same-sex couples in New Jersey is strong and growing. New Jersey favors marriage for lesbian and gay couples 56 to 39 percent, according to a Garden State Equality-Zogby poll of New Jersey voters surveyed earlier this year.

Why indeed didn't the state simply place same-sex marriage on a ballot and have the good sheeple of Jersey vote for it, rather than tossing it over to the liberal courts? And not for a moment do I believe the Zogby poll results.

Ann Coulter: DEMS' FAVORITE HALLOWEEN COSTUME: PATRIOT

"...On "60 Minutes" last Sunday night, aspiring House speaker Nancy Pelosi denounced the war in Iraq as not "part of the war on terror." The war on terror, she said "is the war in Afghanistan."

So that's it. The one part of the war on terror — or "so-called war on terror," as New York Times so-called columnist Bob Herbert calls it — Democrats even pretend to support is the war in Afghanistan.

Immediately after the attacks of 9/11, Democrats had no choice but to vote in favor of that war — of any war. (Save one member of Congress — guess which party? Answer: Rep. Barbara Lee, Democrat, of California.)

If Bush had gone to war with Iraq immediately after 9/11 and waited to attack Afghanistan, Democrats would now be pretending to support the Iraq war while pointlessly carping about Afghanistan. Afghanistan didn't attack us on 9/11! The Taliban didn't attack us! What's our exit strategy? How do you define "victory" in Afghanistan, anyway? It's a quagmire — aahhhhh!

The beauty of Democrats' pretending to be hawks on Afghanistan is that most people can't remember what liberals said five minutes after they said it, much less five years later.

In fact, during the brief five weeks it took American forces to take Kabul and send the Taliban scurrying, liberals were not the flag-waving patriots they would have us believe.

In October 2001, Sen. Joe Biden gave a speech before the Council on Foreign Relations saying that America's air war in Afghanistan made the United States look like "this high-tech bully that thinks from the air we can do whatever we want to do."

Four weeks before U.S. troops completely vanquished the Taliban, Kim Jong Il's pal, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, said on CNN's "Capital Gang" that the Taliban would not soon be toppled. He cited his experience with the Taliban, saying: "I think they can hold on for a while. They were very resilient."

Howard Dean joined Michael Moore in arguing that Osama bin Laden was innocent until proved guilty.

Except for a few idiots like Biden, Richardson and Dean, most politicians — who have to run for election — duly voted in favor of the war in Afghanistan and let their mouthpieces in the media bash it for them. (Remember: A lot of them voted for war in Iraq, too.)

Democrats who would not have to face voters — we call them "reporters" — were calling Afghanistan a "quagmire" approximately six minutes after we invaded.

Thomas Ricks, the Washington Post reporter who currently has a book out saying the war in Iraq is not succeeding, also said the war in Afghanistan was not succeeding.

On Oct. 27, 2001, Ricks said this about Afghanistan — not Iraq: "Although there is little evidence — yet — that the U.S. approach is succeeding, officials at the Pentagon and the White House said yesterday that they are sticking with their original strategy."

Our boys had taken Kabul before Ricks' article hit the recycling bin.

The media gave us gleeful reports on friendly fire incidents in Afghanistan, incessant body counts, numbers of civilian dead and polls showing that the rest of world hated us. Christiane Amanpour reported on CNN in February 2002 that "77 percent of those (Muslims) interviewed said the U.S. war in Afghanistan was morally unjustifiable." The Muslim world hates us — because of the war Democrats claim to support.

In an Oct. 27, 2001, column titled "How to Lose a War," New York Times columnist Frank Rich wrote that the Taliban "are proving Viet Cong-like in their intractability." He stated categorically that "we're losing that battle for Afghan hearts and minds" — proving Rich to be as competent a military analyst as any longtime New York Times theater critic could reasonably be expected to be.

Say, when is the Times going to hire generals to review the latest Broadway offerings? I think more people would like to read Tommy Franks' review of "Rent" than Frank Rich's review of a war.

Times columnist Maureen Dowd, more macho than Rich, asked: "Are we quagmiring ourselves again?" Apparently so. She cited Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem's denial that we were getting bogged down in Afghanistan as "a sure sign we're getting bogged down."

In October 2001, on ABC News' "World News Tonight," anchor Peter Jennings asked Gen. Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan: "Do you believe that the United States is possibly facing a quagmire in Afghanistan?"

The first time liberals had a kind word for the war in Afghanistan was when they needed to pretend to support some war in order to attack the war in Iraq with greater vigor. To get them to support the Iraq war, all we have to do is attack Iran."

The Taliban folded easier than a cheap filling station map, and much to the Dems surprise and ultimate sorrow, didn't hang around long enough to kill enough of our military men.

It's that double-edged sword for them, you see. They despise the military, but dead soldiers mean they must play act and scream QUAGMIRE. We win without that much of a fuss, and since there's nothing to bitch about, they complain about the harder battle in Iraq, the one they should be supporting because our men are in the battle of their lives.

Iraq is win-win for the liberals. They get to see much higher casualty lists, making it more palatable for them to feign sorrow before shouting...you got it...

QUAGMIRE!

Recreants Rejoice...All Things Are Possible When A Loon SitsThe Bench

Declaring that "times have changed," the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled yesterday that gay and lesbian couples have the same rights as heterosexual couples - and kicked open the door to same-sex marriage.

But the court left it to Garden State lawmakers to either rewrite the marriage statute or create some form of civil unions - and gave them six months to do it.

Until then, gay New Yorkers still will have to shlep to Massachusetts - the only state where gay marriage is legal - if they want to formally tie the knot.

"I still think this is an enormous victory," said Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer who led a failed bid this summer to overturn New York State's ban on gay marriage. "All that's left open is whether you use the word marriage or not."

Mayor Bloomberg also hailed the ruling.

"I've always believed it's not the government's business who you marry, and I'm committed to work in Albany to change the laws in New York," he said at an event in Chicago."

Of course. The government, as the duly elected overseer of it's society, shouldn't care if you march into a chapel with a billygoat or Rocky the Flying Squirrel. Or if you want 6 or 7 spouses. Or if you favor a harem of 9 year-olds. How's about hitching up with that old baseball glove you sleep with anyway. And if a government doesn't have a stake in the core beliefs of the society it represents, then hell, divorce should be just as easy. Kick the old bag out when she's getting as wrinkly as that Wal-Mart suitjacket.

And hell yeah, the times have changed. So many people rape and murder and rob you blind that perhaps it's time to make those peccadillo's legal as well.

Liberals. Linear thinking. The twain does not meet.

Oprah And Madonna...Perfect Together

October 26, 2006 -- "SHE'S never giving that kid back.

Speaking in a weird half-British accent, Madonna told a burbling Oprah Winfrey that the child she manipulated away from his dirt poor African dad is better off with the sluttish superstar than with his own people.

"And I say: God bless you for that!" clueless Oprah cheered, as she failed to ask a single tough question.

For half an hour, one know-nothing celeb egged on another to spin a tale of saving the African continent. Disgusting.

Oprah: "With all the other real atrocities going on in the world, all this attention is focused on you. When did you realize this had become this big of a deal?"

Madonna blamed the media, naturally, for screwing up her adoption of David Banda. She admitted she determined he was HIV-negative before taking him home.

She was severely patronizing to David's dad, Yohane - who has said he didn't realize he was giving up David "for good."

"This is a simple man who comes from a village who has nothing," she snipped.

"Suddenly he is besieged by the media of the world" - implying Yohane was too dumb to deal with reporters, but smart enough to understand he was giving Madonna his kid.

Madonna offered: "I was told [in Malawi]: 'There is a possibility you won't be able to adopt him.' I was told to look around at all the orphanages and I had to come up with other candidates."

Good God, girl. Did officials try to steer you away from David because this boy had a family?

Oprah never asked.

She also failed to challenge Madonna's assertion that Yohane never visited David at the orphanage where he was placed after his mother died. Some reports said Yohane walked 25 miles a week to see his son.

"He looked into my eyes and said to me he was grateful I was going to give his son a life and, had he kept him in the village, he would have buried him. I didn't really need any more confirmation," Madonna sniffed.

So she secured Yohane's permission to take his flesh - in writing.

Oprah didn't mention he could not read.

Don't trust these women with innocents."

Couple of decades ago and Oprah would have been the stuff bad science fiction was made of. A person so incredibly dumb that people believed her to be deep. The female version of Peter Sellers' character Chauncey Gardner in the movie "Being There". Madonna just proves that the right slut in the right place and time can make a bundle. Then again, every lucky whore has known that. Put the two of them, the irresistable slut and the immovable idiot, in the same space and time and we're fortunate the world itself did not implode.

The NY Daily News sees this far differently, but of course, and delivers a puff piece as they giggily recall the good old days when anyone with enough cash could have their very own little negro.