Thursday, January 11, 2007

We Get Letters

"Once again your clownish attempt at deriding the unknown has led to the presentation of incorrect information. Until you've actually shot someone with Extreme Shock ammunition wouldn't it be better to merely offer am 'I don't know?'"

Who says? I'll return to this once more then it's, as the french say, fi-nee. Extreme Shock ammunition is a waste of money. The rounds in question DO inflict ugly, but quite superficial wounds. They have, in all of their iterations, been used in pretty much every place that has seen modern combat, and with the same result. Land a shot to an extremity and the damage appears quite severe. Hit the torso and nada. Inflicting wounds that, without medical attention, will EVENTUALLY prove fatal is not what firearms were designed for. None of the super-dee-duper ninja-killer-maneaters manufactured by this company have, to date, been deemed as good as, let alone better than, what is available from Winchester, Remington, Federal, and many others. Virtually all of our special service forces have tried the stuff and it stinks. On people. Great varmint rounds, but please now.

And just between me and you, did you really think our guys in uniform hadn't tried Extreme Shock? Or any of the bogus carny-rounds that are being offered by snakeoil salesman the world over?

You don't know much then, do ya.

Bottom line; its your money. Buy what ever floats the boat. But before jumping to the conclusion that information is offered just for the sake of wasting cyber-space, think again. Every modern bullet, and some not-so-modern, too, has been used, over and over again, and the list of what works and what does not is common knowledge for everyone but you. And if you wanted to know more, which I doubt, you just blew it.

No comments: