Liberals Circling The Wagons Over Appeals Court Ruling

This so is SO ass-backwards its hard to find where to begin:

Gun laws as a right to safety

A court refutes a 1939 Supreme Court ruling against gun rights, perhaps opening a Pandora's box.

The Monitor's View

The District of Columbia law barred handguns in the home unless they were registered before 1976, the year the law took effect. It also required owners of registered guns to keep them disassembled or trigger locked.

f the Supreme Court gets this case and clearly upholds gun ownership as a right, it should at least deflate the political battle by ruling that courts should use only the most limited scrutiny in challenging gun laws. Firearms ownership must be treated as much as a privilege as a right.

Judges have long done that with property rights, allowing strong government controls over land use for compelling reasons. In free speech, too, courts deny that right if safety is threatened. Certainly public fears over rising gun violence deserve court leniency toward gun laws – if not a clear right to exist."

No, no, NO! The public is fearful of CRIMINALS with guns and not having the capability to defend themselves! The only people believing that the common person should not own a gun are liberal politicians, minority Reverends, the mainstream media, and those they've fooled into thinking that locking yourself in the bathroom while dialing 911 is the best thing to do.

And where did the CSM get the stupid idea that since owning a gun is a right it should be treated as a privilege?

The War On Guns answers this nonsense as well as anyone until I show it to Fits.

I truly didn't know how left-wing so many religious affiliations are, and its still a shock.