One Of The Latest Scams Brought To You By The OLD CONGRESS..

The Renewable Electricity Standard

• RES will reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2008, the U.S. generated only 1.1% of its electricity from oil, generally on-site at refineries, etc. RES will do little to reduce U.S. oil dependency.

• Solar and wind need the same subsidies as oil. Countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, and China sell gasoline to their citizens at below-market prices, thereby subsidizing it. The U.S. does not. It taxes gasoline and other oil products. U.S. energy policies should not be determined by other countries.

• Solar and wind need tax and regulatory subsidies as oil did. The Rockefellers and others did not build the oil industry with subsidies and protective tariffs. They built it by offering a superior product at an affordable price. Kerosene was far superior to candles and less expensive than whale oil. Tax breaks did not come until the U.S. implemented high taxes to pay for WWI, which it needed oil to win.

• Wind power will reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The wind industry has failed to produce a single compelling study based on experience to support the claim. If it had one, it would flaunt it.

• Megawatt capacity compares the capability of solar and wind with other sources. Megawatt nameplate capacity is grossly misleading. All sources of electricity need some downtime for maintenance. In the U.S., nuclear produces over 90% of megawatt capacity, base load coal exceeds 70%. Operators control the downtime for nuclear and coal. However, nature controls most of the downtime for solar and wind. The frequently cited figure for wind is usually 30% of megawatt capacity, but that is also misleading. The most useful statistic is dispatchable capacity -- what the producer can guarantee for, say, New York City at 4 pm on August 7. For nuclear and coal, it is almost 100%. For wind it is less than 10% and may approach zero! There are few facts available for solar.

• Once built, electricity from wind and solar are low-cost. Wind and solar power are highly unreliable. To prevent blackouts, wind and solar require costly backup that must be immediately available, which is expensive and inefficient. They are a waste of resources.

• Dependability of wind and solar can be raised by building more and with the smart grid. Germany thought so, but experience shows the reverse. Germany discovered that the greater the number of wind turbines, and solar panels, the more susceptible the grid system is to failure. Thus, to prevent blackouts, the greater the use of wind and solar, the greater is the need for backup.

• RES will provide high-paying green jobs. If jobs are the issue, it is better to build pyramids in the desert. At least once the construction stops, we will not saddle our children and grandchildren with high utility bills.

• We need RES to win the race with China in these new forms of energy. Solar and wind have been used for thousands of years and still remain unreliable. China is in a totally different race -- a race to build the greatest possible capacity of affordable, dependable electricity for the benefit of its citizens. A brief examination of what China is actually building, as compared to what is "planned" or what RES promoters claim, demonstrates China's goal:

• Today, China is constructing 24 nuclear power plants -- the U.S., only one.

• In 2008, China added 20.1 GWe of hydro capacity -- the U.S., zero GWe.

• In 2008, China added 65.8 GWe of coal-fired capacity (net increase, while closing 26 GWe of old, inefficient coal-fired capacity) -- the U.S., 0.7 GWe.

• In 2008, China added 4.7 GWe of wind -- the U.S., 8.5 GWe (nameplate) of wind.

The one U.S. bright spot not reflected in the above statistics is the falling prices of natural gas, which is now competitive in many places with coal for generation of electricity. This change came from new techniques for extraction of gas from deeply buried dense shale thanks to innovative private enterprise, not government mandates or subsidies. 

When one looks at facts rather than "plans," clearly, the U.S. is winning the wind race in which China is not even running. China is winning the race for affordable, dependable electricity for the prosperity of its citizens -- a race the federal government refuses to recognize.

Are the leaders of Communist China more concerned for the future of Chinese citizens, their children, and their grandchildren than the leaders of the 111^th Congress are concerned for Americans, their children, and their grandchildren?

A vote for RES will tell!"

Read it all here. Comment if you'd like of course. Me, I cannot. American Thinkers apparently do not include career Marines, as we appear to be banned for life, sniff, never to add to the discourse. Sniff.