Thursday, October 06, 2005

Ann Coulter Defends Her Non-Defense Of The Presidents Indefensible Choice For Secretary Of The Year...

...Beg Pardon, Make That The Presidents Choice For Supreme Court Justice...

Welcome to AnnCoulter.com

"One Web site defending Bush's choice of a graduate from an undistinguished law school complains that Miers' critics "are playing the Democrats' game," claiming that the "GOP is not the party which idolizes Ivy League acceptability as the criterion of intellectual and mental fitness." (In the sort of error that results from trying to sound "Ivy League" rather than being clear, that sentence uses the grammatically incorrect "which" instead of "that." Web sites defending the academically mediocre would be a lot more convincing without all the grammatical errors.)

Actually, all the intellectual firepower in the law is coming from conservatives right now — and thanks for noticing! Liberals got stuck trying to explain Roe v. Wade and are still at work 30 years later trying to come up with a good argument. But the main point is: Au contraire! It is conservatives defending Miers' mediocre resume who are playing the Democrats' game. Contrary to recent practice, the job of being a Supreme Court justice is not to be a philosopher-king. Only someone who buys into the liberals' view of Supreme Court justices as philosopher-kings could hold legal training irrelevant to a job on the Supreme Court..."

French. Ann said something in French and I didn't chunder so maybe it's NOT the language itself that makes me wanna strangle whomever is, with pursed widdle wips, speaking it, but the affectated synchophants of everything European who - wait -where was I?

Oh yeah, Ann's new column on the Presidents selection to replace one incompetant old bag with another is up and worth the look. I've stopped being so sensitive about the whole thing, for I've really come to the conclusion that he felt it necessary to replace Sandy Day with Harriet because someone told him that Ginsberg will be retiring soon and he's gotta sneak in another old broad before Feinstein convinces the Republican side of the aisle that she's been right all along and Bush knows nothing about women's shoes and that makes him even more insensitive than she imagined a modern human could possibly be.

Harriet will have all the right answers for Di-Fi and she'll agree to the point of tears with Schumer about modesty, and Joe Biden will be positively GLOWING as he finally gets to look smart compared to a Supreme Court Justice. She's a cinch, Joanie Ginsberg retires next year then W gives us Janice just to keep it in the J's. You thought Ginsberg's first name was Ruth? Nah, it's that woman thing of having so many names that it confuses everybody, so she uses her middle name instead and somebody JUST told that to Bush so Brownie's a lock for the next opening.

That is, as long as Jane Goodall is unavailable.

No comments: