Sunday, April 02, 2006

George Will Tries To Atone...

...For being such an idiot on immigration, by exposing, somewhat, junk-science for the junk it truly is...

"...Recently, Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer flew with ABC's George Stephanopoulos over Glacier National Park's receding glaciers. But Schweitzer offered hope: Everyone, buy Montana coal. New technologies can, he said, burn it while removing carbon causes of global warming.
Stephanopoulos noted that such technologies are at least four years away and "all the scientists" say something must be done "right now."

Schweitzer, quickly recovering from hopefulness and returning to the "be worried, be very worried" message, said "it's even more critical than that" because China and India are going to "put more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere with conventional coal-fired generators than all of the rest of the planet has during the last 150 years."

That is one reason why the Clinton administration never submitted the Kyoto accord on global warming for Senate ratification. In 1997, the Senate voted 95-0 that the accord would disproportionately burden America while being too permissive toward major polluters that are America's trade competitors.

While worrying about Montana's receding glaciers, Schweitzer, who is 50, should also worry about the fact that when he was 20 he was told to be worried, very worried, about global cooling. Science magazine (Dec. 10, 1976) warned of "extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation." Science Digest (February 1973) reported that "the world's climatologists are agreed" that we must "prepare for the next ice age."

The Christian Science Monitor ("Warning: Earth's Climate is Changing Faster than Even Experts Expect," Aug. 27, 1974) reported that glaciers "have begun to advance," "growing seasons in England and Scandinavia are getting shorter" and "the North Atlantic is cooling down about as fast as an ocean can cool." Newsweek agreed ("The Cooling World," April 28, 1975) that meteorologists "are almost unanimous" that catastrophic famines might result from the global cooling that The New York Times (Sept. 14, 1975) said "may mark the return to another ice age."
The Times (May 21, 1975) also said "a major cooling of the climate is widely considered inevitable" now that it is "well established" that the Northern Hemisphere's climate "has been getting cooler since about 1950."

In fact, the earth is always experiencing either warming or cooling. But suppose the scientists and their journalistic conduits, who today say they were so spectacularly wrong so recently, are now correct. Suppose the earth is warming and suppose the warming is caused by human activity. Are we sure there will be proportionate benefits from whatever climate change can be purchased at the cost of slowing economic growth and spending trillions?

Are we sure the consequences of climate change - remember, a thick sheet of ice once covered the Middle West - must be bad? Or has the science-journalism complex decided that debate about these questions, too, is "over"?

About the mystery that vexes ABC - Why have Americans been slow to get in lock step concerning global warming? - perhaps the "problem" is not big oil or big coal, both of which have discovered there is big money to be made from tax breaks and other subsidies justified in the name of combating carbon. Perhaps the problem is big crusading journalism."
____________________________________
So then, why does the Media continue to do such awful things to us? Because it sells newspapers and air-time. They tried really hard with the Global Cooling news, but that didn't work, so it was on to something else. Nothing draws the publics attention more than a good old fashioned train wreck, and a Planet-Wreck is mana from heaven.

Anyone remember the Killer Bees? They were supposed to arrive from South America and destroy the ecosystem of the United States in mere decades. During a time of earthquake activity, California is described as mere inches away from dropping off into the Pacific Ocean, and while that would be a good thing, it simply is not going to happen. Whenever Mt. St. Helens kicks up a storm we're reminded of the fact that at any given point in time all of the American volcano's could suddenly become active all at once and it's adios, amigo's for the whole country.

The Loons love being frightened, and there's big bucks in trying to scare the rest of us.

4 comments:

Lemuel Calhoon said...

"Anyone remember the Killer Bees? They were supposed to arrive from South America and destroy the ecosystem of the United States in mere decades."

I always wondered why it never occured to anyone to wonder why humans survived in South America.

Anonymous said...

What everybody usually fails to mention when using India and China to feed the doomsday scenarios is that both of those countries are rapidly improving the efficiency of their energy consumption. This is relatively easy for them to do because they are so far behind in that area to begin with.




China Law

Fits said...

You're kidding right. The entire world is aghast at what China intends to use as energy. India isn't that far behind in burning coal that wouldn't pass muster 40 years ago.

And sure, it WOULD be relatively easy for them to begin cleaning up their act, but who says they will even try. Not them, certainly. Bill Clinton even looked at the data and said sweet christ, nothing WE do is going to make any difference.

Thanks for the comment, CLB. In a perect world it'd be all good.

Lemuel Calhoon said...

Perhaps it has something to do with Native American mysticism. They have ways of “knowing” that we will never understand until we break the chains of “logic” and “facts”. Several feminist authors have began to blaze the trail with essays on “Womyn’s ways of Knowing”.

I could send you some links. . .