Saturday, April 22, 2006

Stop The ACLU...On The Rats Who Sang

"As investigations into the leaking of classified information nabbs (sic) Mary McCarthy, the far left are jumping to the leakers' defense. Of course the NY Times wants to be included with those doing the defense. Wizbang notes how the media is circling the wagons.
Atlass Shrugs notes that:

In what is becoming a bad trend for Mary, she is now linked with Sandy Berger and Richard Clarke. Especially this strange reference (again from the 9-11 report):

9. See Joint Inquiry briefing by Mike, Sept. 12,2002.For briefings to the NSC,see NSC email,Clarke to Berger, "Threat Warning: Usama bin Ladin," Mar. 7, 1998; Mary McCarthy interview (Dec. 8, 2003); CIA memos, summary of weekly Berger/Tenet meeting, May 1, 1998.

And she has some advice for the Bush's:
FIRE ANY ONE THAT WORKED UNDER THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, I mean really.

The investigations are growing into big news, and the CIA is warning that this is only the beggining. This may even reach into the Senate, where a few liberal Senators may be facing polygraph tests.

During the Bush Administration, a nexus of politicians, government workers and members of the news media have worked overtime in leaking classified information. From the secret terrorist prisons to the National Security Agency's super-secret surveillance program, intelligence officials and the Bush Administration have had to watch their counterterrorism efforts neutralized for political reasons.

But people such as former deputy-undersecretary of Defense Jed Babbin don't think the Justice Department investigators and prosecutors have the guts to indict a US senator. Babbin said it would cause a battle royal on the Hill, if not a constitutional crisis.

He did say however, that any senator or Congressional staffer that holds a security clearance can be asked at any time to take a polygraph. The individual can of course refuse to take the test, but failure to do so is reason to remove that person's security clearance. Babbin further said that Senators Rockefeller, Durbin, and Wyden, and some on their staffs will soon be requested to take polygraphs.

But don't expect too much to come from these leak investigations. When the leakers are Democrats, they are called whistleblowers; when they're Republicans they're called leakers.

Also, no senator has been disciplined for leaking since 1987, when Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was forced to give up his seat on the powerful Senate Intelligence Committee. It was discovered he leaked classified information to reporters. Now he's on the Senate Judiciary Committee which is currently investigating top secret information regarding the NSA surveillance activities.

Gateway Pundit wonders if it was this news that impressed Time magazine enough to include Dick Durbin on their "Best Senators" list:
Captain's Quarter's and Rightwing Nuthouse ponder whether it was a sting operation.

AJ Strata is all over the leak story.
___________________________
What?

A 'Sting" operation? So it was decided that such bad fricking press would be worth setting up these detweillers? For what? Stings are supposed to make you look good, not bad, and bad is the only thing the media will focus upon when discussing Democratic Whistle Blowers. The loons...as well as shepple-fence-sitters... are believing that we've established dungeons all over the world, no one is changing their minds anytime soon, and this was all done on purpose?

Captain Ed really really DID say that he believed it might be a sting? No. C'mon now. I know that the Northern Alliance hasn't clue-one, but this is silly even for them.

2 comments:

Patrick Joubert Conlon said...

I'm going to keep up with this story and I hope other bloggers do too because the MSM won't.

Fits said...

Copy that.