"Analysis of an Associated Press report released over the weekend shows that Americans
need to be able to defend themselves and others from terrorist attacks right here within the United States," gun rights expert John Snyder said here today.
Snyder cited an AP article stating that "a U.S.-born spokesman for al-Qaida on Saturday urged Muslims living in the United States and Europe to carry out attacks there, calling it a duty and an obligation."
Snyder said that, "Law-abiding American citizens must be able to get, carry and use firearms needed for self-defense without unnecessary legal encumbrances. This includes handguns."
A former National Rifle Association editor, Snyder is Public Affairs Director of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and Treasurer of the Second Amendment Foundation.
Snyder noted the AP piece quoted a director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Michigan chapter stating with regard to the spokesman's statement that, "I see little or no chance of such sentiment taking root in metropolitan Detroit."
"However," said Snyder, "the director did not condemn the spokesman's statement."
need to be able to defend themselves and others from terrorist attacks right here within the United States," gun rights expert John Snyder said here today.
Snyder cited an AP article stating that "a U.S.-born spokesman for al-Qaida on Saturday urged Muslims living in the United States and Europe to carry out attacks there, calling it a duty and an obligation."
Snyder said that, "Law-abiding American citizens must be able to get, carry and use firearms needed for self-defense without unnecessary legal encumbrances. This includes handguns."
A former National Rifle Association editor, Snyder is Public Affairs Director of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and Treasurer of the Second Amendment Foundation.
Snyder noted the AP piece quoted a director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Michigan chapter stating with regard to the spokesman's statement that, "I see little or no chance of such sentiment taking root in metropolitan Detroit."
"However," said Snyder, "the director did not condemn the spokesman's statement."
Beg pardon but I'm confused. Why would the "director" condemn Mr Synder's statement?
Be kinda dumbass now, wouldn't it? Seeing as how the "director" didn't condemn the call for American-based moslems to attack innocent women and children, how could the "director" condemn the warning to be prepared for such attacks?
And not for nothing, but if Mr. Snyder can be named, then so should this moslem apologist "director".
No comments:
Post a Comment